Djinious
Customer supportEnterprise operations

Customer support

A model reads every ticket, rules do the routing, the clock is watched every quarter hour, and Friday’s digest writes itself.

DjiniousWorkflow
The lead records page in DjiniousWorkflow, listing records written by the scoring graph with their score, band, queue and SLA.

Webhook · classification · SLA clock

The ticket arrives on a webhook. A model classifies it — billing, bug, how-to, churn risk — and everything after that decision is ordinary graph: priority from the plan and the category, a queue, an SLA, a record, a page for whoever has to answer it.

The classifier’s error branch is a keyword rule set, because a triage queue that stops when an inference endpoint has a bad afternoon is not a triage queue you put in front of customers. Every record says which of the two labelled it.

How the graphs run

  1. Inbound webhook

    With its own token, per trigger.

  2. ai:classify with a retry

    And a rule-based fallback on its error branch.

  3. A switch with four outputs

    The SLA each queue carries is stated in the node.

  4. Every fifteen minutes

    What is late, what is about to be, and whose queue it is in.

On the canvas

ai:classify · flow:switch · entities:create · notify:* · Schedules

It ships with the product

This project ships with DjiniousWorkflow. One command seeds it, another runs every graph in it, and the captures here came out of those runs.

Where a graph leans on a fixture rather than a live system, it reads the fixture where your deployment would read a database — swap the node at the top and the rest of the graph does not change. The engine work — the fan-out, the gather, the approval, the publish — is the product’s own.